Little Difference with Further Chemo for Breast Cancer - Similar outcomes regardless of whether patients initially responded to chemotherapy - RNweb
Web Poll
Would remote electronic ICU monitoring improve patient care in your facility?
Yes
No
Yes
91%
No
9%
Thank you for participating in our poll.
Subscribe to our sister nursing publications

Get a FREE subscription to:


Healthcare Traveler

Little Difference with Further Chemo for Breast Cancer
Similar outcomes regardless of whether patients initially responded to chemotherapy

RN

Breast cancer patients who initially respond to chemotherapy have similar outcomes with further cycles of chemotherapy, while patients who do not initially respond and are treated with further chemotherapy or a different chemotherapy regimen also have similar outcomes, according to two studies published in the April 16 issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

In the first study, Gunter von Minckwitz, M.D., from Universitats-Frauenklinik Frankfurt and German Breast Group in Neu-Isenburg, Germany, and colleagues randomly assigned 1,390 breast cancer patients who had initially responded to chemotherapy with docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, to a further four or six cycles of the same chemotherapy for a total of six or eight cycles. The researchers found that the two arms had similar rates of pathological complete response and breast-conserving surgery. The eight-cycle arm had more clinical and sonographic complete responses at surgery but also had more adverse events.

In the second study, the same group of researchers randomly assigned 622 breast cancer patients who did not initially respond to chemotherapy with docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, to an additional four cycles of the same chemotherapy or four cycles of vinorelbine and capecitabine chemotherapy. The researchers found that the two arms had similar rates of sonographic response, breast-conserving surgery and pathologic complete response. The vinorelbine and capecitabine arm was better tolerated.

"The GeparTrio study is, to our knowledge, the first prospective randomized trial to address this population; however, it was not able to identify a successful improvement in treatment efficacy. New biological agents, preferably those that have a mechanism of action involving the induction of drug sensitivity, should therefore be developed for use in this setting," the authors conclude.

The studies received funding from Amgen, Roche, and Sanofi-Aventis.

Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)


Prepared jointly by the editors of RN and HealthDay's Physicians' Briefing (www.physiciansbriefing.com).

Other Articles from RN
Gender Differences Identified in Asthma Pathogenesis
More U.S. Women Using Contraceptive Services
Recurrence Risk High for Some Breast Cancer Patients
Comorbidities Worsen Fatigue in HIV-Positive Patients
Drugs Can Slow Lung Function Decline in Pulmonary Disease
Search
Make This Page Your Home Page!
Customized Patient Education Handouts
Clinical Resources
powered by Mediwire
SEARCH:
 
View All Topics
Source: RN,
Click here